Salud comunitaria. Innovando en la formación de residentes de medicina familiar y comunitaria / Community health. Innovating in the training of family and community medicine residents

Objetivo: Conocer las opiniones de los agentes implicados en la formación de residentes de medicina familiar y comunitaria para mejorar el proceso formativo del «Proyecto de Apoyo a la Revitalización de la Atención Primaria; Activos para la Salud Comunitaria» (PARAC) teniendo en cuenta su adecuación, contextualización y las metodologías utilizadas.Método: Estudio cualitativo interpretativo-explicativo de orientación fenomenológica, multinivel y multicéntrico, en el que se analiza la opinión de las personas participantes. Entre 2018 y 2020 se realizaron 12 grupos focales y 24 entrevistas semiestructuradas, participando 67 profesionales pertenecientes a seis distritos sanitarios de Andalucía, que estuvieron implicados/as en el proceso formativo PARAC.Resultados: Las personas participantes consideran necesario ampliar la formación en salud comunitaria de los/las residentes. Para ello, creen necesario realizar cambios en el plan formativo de la especialidad, otorgando mayor protagonismo a la atención primaria de salud que a las rotaciones hospitalarias. Valoran positivamente las metodologías utilizadas en el proceso formativo PARAC, que consideran «novedosas», y la elección de docentes jóvenes que sirvan como referentes. Para que sus intervenciones en el territorio se realicen con calidad y seguridad para la población, piden que se garanticen unos tiempos y unos espacios específicos para la salud comunitaria, así como una adecuada supervisión que ayude a asegurar la coherencia y la continuidad de sus intervenciones.Conclusiones: La formación en salud comunitaria de los/las residentes de medicina familiar y comunitaria requiere un esfuerzo pedagógico, didáctico y curricular que los/las prepare para el trabajo con la comunidad, así como la garantía de unas condiciones organizativas que permitan este trabajo.(AU)

Objective: To know the opinions of the agents involved in the training of family and community medicine residents in order to improve the training process of the «Project to Support the Revitalization of Primary Care; Assets for Community Health» (PARAC) taking into account its adequacy, contextualization and the methodologies used.Method: Qualitative interpretative-explanatory study of phenomenological orientation, multilevel and multicenter, in which the opinion of the participants is analyzed. Between 2018 and 2020, 12 focus groups and 24 semi-structured interviews were carried out, with the participation of sixty-seven professionals from six health districts of Andalusia (Spain), who were involved in the PARAC training process.Results: The participants consider it necessary to broaden training in community health for residents. To this end, they consider it necessary to make changes in the training plan of the specialty, giving more importance to primary health care than to hospital rotations. They value positively the methodologies used in the PARAC training process, which they consider «novel», and the choice of young teachers to serve as references. In order for their interventions in the territory to be carried out with quality and safety for the population, they ask that specific times and spaces be guaranteed for community health, as well as adequate supervision to help ensure the coherence and continuity of their interventions.Conclusions: Training in community health for family and community medicine residents requires a pedagogical, didactic and curricular effort that prepares them for work with the community, as well as the guarantee of organizational conditions that allow this work.(AU)

Residência de Medicina de Família e Comunidade: percepções de egressos sobre sua formação e processo de trabalho / Residencia de medicina de familia y comunidad: percepciones de egresados sobre su formación y proceso de trabajo / Family and Community Medicine Residency: graduates' insights about their education and work process

Analisou-se como as residências de Medicina de Família e Comunidade (RMFC) de uma capital da região norte do Brasil contribuíram para a formação e o desenvolvimento do atual processo de trabalho de seus egressos. Estudo exploratório, descritivo e transversal, com abordagem qualitativa focada em 31 egressos por meio de aplicação de questionário eletrônico com perguntas abertas. As respostas foram interpretadas por Análise de Conteúdo Temática, constituídas por quatro categorias empíricas: a formação em Medicina de Família e Comunidade (MFC) no processo de trabalho do egresso; reconhecimento e aplicação dos atributos da Atenção Primária à Saúde (APS); potências da formação em RMFC; e os desafios da especialidade. Os programas de RMFC estudados contribuem para a formação da prática profissional e do perfil dos seus egressos por meio do fortalecimento e da efetivação dos atributos da Atenção Primária à Saúde (APS), inclusive estendendo-se para além da especialidade.(AU)

Se analizó cómo las residencias de Medicina de Familia y Comunidad (RMFC) de una capital de la región Norte de Brasil contribuyeron en la formación y el desarrollo del actual proceso de trabajo de sus egresados. Estudio exploratorio, descriptivo y transversal, con abordaje cualitativo enfocado en 31 egresados por medio de la aplicación de cuestionario electrónico con preguntas abiertas. Las respuestas se interpretaron por Análisis de Contenido Temático, constituyéndose cuatro categorías empíricas: la formación en Medicina de Familia y Comunidad (MFC) en el proceso de trabajo del egresado; reconocimiento y aplicación de los tributos de la Atención Primaria de la Salud (APS); potencias de la formación en RMFC y los desafíos de la especialidad. Los programas de RMFC estudiados contribuyen con la formación de la práctica profesional y con el perfil de sus egresados por medio del fortalecimiento y puesta en práctica de los atributos de la APS, incluso ampliándose más allá de la especialidad.(AU)

The article analyzed how the Residency in Family and Community Medicine (RFCM) in a capital of the Northern region of Brazil contributed to the formation and development of the current work process of its graduates. This is an exploratory, descriptive and cross-sectional study, with a qualitative approach focused on 31 graduates, through electronic questionnaires with open questions. The answers were interpreted based on the Content Analysis Thematic technique, constituting four empirical categories: training in Family and Community Medicine (FCM) in the graduate's work process; recognition and application of the attributes of Primary Health Care (PHC); potentials of the FCM training and the challenges of the specialty. The analyzed data show that the studied Programs contribute to the education for professional practice and the profile of its graduates through the strengthening and implementation of the Primary Health Care (PHC) attributes, also extending beyond the specialty.(AU)

Hacia un modelo de atención en salud para el siglo XXI: breve historia del modelo de atención integrada en Chile / Towards a Health Care Model for the 21st Century: a brief history of the integrated care model in Chile

El desarrollo y organización del sistema sanitario en Chile tuvo importantes cambios durante la segunda mitad del siglo pasado, los que permitieron al país mejorar sustantivamente algunos índices de salud poblacional. Por otra parte, tanto el cambio de paradigma biomédico que surgió en el mundo durante las últimas décadas del siglo XX y que se orientaba hacia un modelo biopsicosocial de salud, como la aparición del concepto de Atención Primaria de Salud (APS) como una estrategia de intervención social, se sumaron al cambio en el perfil epidemiológico y demográfico del país y a las expectativas de la población, para alzarse todos ellos como factores catalizadores de un nuevo cambio en la forma de organizar la atención de salud en Chile. Esto generó un espacio para el desarrollo y fortalecimiento del nivel primario de atención de salud y de la medicina ambulatoria, lo que impulsó también la aparición de una nueva generación de especialistas que fueran capaces de dar solución a la gran mayoría de los problemas de las personas y de las comunidades, los médicos especialistas en Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria. Esta nueva forma de organización sanitaria, actualmente vigente en Chile, y que se enmarca dentro del Modelo de Atención Integral de Salud iniciado a comienzos del siglo XXI, está basado en un sistema de salud sustentado en el modelo biopsicosocial y en la APS; y su eje primordial son las personas, las familias y las comunidades.

The development and organization of the health system in Chile underwent important changes during the second half of the last century that allowed the country to substantially improve some population health indices. On the other hand, both the change in the biomedical paradigm that emerged in the world during the last decades of the 20th century and which was oriented towards a biopsychosocial model of health, as well as the appearance of the concept of Primary Health Care as a social intervention strategy, they added to the change in the epidemiological and demographic profile of the country and the expectations of the population, all of them rising as catalysts for a new change in the way of organizing health care in Chile. This created a space for the development and strengthening of the primary level of health care and outpatient medicine, which also promoted the emergence of a new generation of specialists who were capable of solving the vast majority of people's problems. and from the communities, specialists in Family and Community Medicine. This new form of health organization, currently in force in Chile, and which is part of the Comprehensive Health Care Model initiated at the beginning of the 21st century, is based on a health system based on the biopsychosocial model and PHC; and its main axis are people, families and communities.

Changes in family medicine visits across sociodemographic groups after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in Ontario: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: It has been suggested that the COVID-19 pandemic has worsened socioeconomic disparities in access to primary care. Given these concerns, we investigated whether the pandemic affected visits to family physicians differently across sociodemographic groups. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using electronic medical records from family physician practices within the University of Toronto Practice-Based Research Network. We evaluated primary care visits for a fixed cohort of patients who were active within the database as of Jan. 1, 2019, to estimate the number of patients who visited their family physician (visitor rate) and the number of distinct visits (visit volume) between Jan. 1, 2019, to June 30, 2020. We compared trends in visitor rate and visit volume during the pandemic (Mar. 14 to June 30, 2020) with the same period in the previous year (Mar. 14 to June 30, 2019) across sociodemographic factors, including age, sex, neighbourhood income, material deprivation and ethnic concentration. RESULTS: We included 365 family physicians and 372 272 patients. Compared with the previous year, visitor rates during the pandemic period dropped by 34.5%, from 357 visitors per 1000 people to 292 visitors per 1000 people. Declines in visit volume during the pandemic were less pronounced (21.8% fewer visits), as the mean number of visits per patient increased during the pandemic (from 1.64 to 1.96). The declines in visitor rate and visit volume varied based on patient age and sex, but not socioeconomic status. INTERPRETATION: Although the number of visits to family physicians dropped substantially during the first few weeks of the COVID-19 pandemic in Ontario, patients from communities with low socioeconomic status did not appear to be disproportionately affected. In this primary care setting, the pandemic appears not to have worsened socioeconomic disparities in access to care.

The COVID-19 Pandemic in Nijmegen, the Netherlands: Changes in Presented Health Problems and Demand for Primary Care.

We studied the changes in presented health problems and demand for primary care since the outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the Netherlands. We analyzed prominent symptom features of COVID-19, and COVID-19 itself as the reason for encounter. Also, we analyzed the number and type of encounters for common important health problems. Respiratory tract symptoms related to COVID-19 were presented more often in 2020 than in 2019. We observed a dramatic increase of telephone/e-mail/Internet consultations in the months after the outbreak. Contacts for other health problems such as prevention and acute and chronic conditions plummeted substantially (P <0.001); mental health problems stabilized.

Development and evolution of a two-day intensive resident experience in geriatric medicine.

As the older adult population increases, the need to enhance medical education and training in Geriatric Medicine (GM) is essential. To enhance resident training, faculty at two southeastern universities developed a Resident Award Summit, a two-day active learning experience, designed to expose family and internal medicine residents to GM principles and the various career options available in GM.Over 10 years, 353 residents from 108 residency programs participated. Resident feedback indicated that attending the event had a positive impact on future practice (M = 4.65, SD = .58) and showed that the amount of GM training received was limited, with 83.5% and 70.2% ranking adequacy of medical student and resident training as limited, respectively.To impact practice, long-term change must occur. Experiences such as the Resident Award Summit allow GM faculty to educate and prepare residents though positive teaching experiences, providing residents with the skills needed to care for older adults in their communities.

Observer Ratings of Shared Decision Making Do Not Match Patient Reports: An Observational Study in 5 Family Medicine Practices.

BACKGROUND: Measuring shared decision making (SDM) in clinical practice is important to improve the quality of health care. Measurement can be done by trained observers and by people participating in the clinical encounter, namely, patients. This study aimed to describe the correlations between patients' and observers' ratings of SDM using 2 validated and 2 nonvalidated SDM measures in clinical consultations. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we recruited 238 complete dyads of health professionals and patients in 5 university-affiliated family medicine clinics in Canada. Participants completed self-administered questionnaires before and after audio-recorded medical consultations. Observers rated the occurrence of SDM during medical consultations using both the validated OPTION-5 (the 5-item "observing patient involvement" score) and binary questions on risk communication and values clarification (RCVC-observer). Patients rated SDM using both the 9-item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q9) and binary questions on risk communication and values clarification (RCVC-patient). RESULTS: Agreement was low between observers' and patients' ratings of SDM using validated OPTION-5 and SDM-Q9, respectively (ρ = 0.07; P = 0.38). Observers' ratings using RCVC-observer were correlated to patients' ratings using either SDM-Q9 (rpb = -0.16; P = 0.01) or RCVC-patients (rpb = 0.24; P = 0.03). Observers' OPTION-5 scores and patients' ratings using RCVC-questions were moderately correlated (rφ = 0.33; P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: There was moderate to no alignment between observers' and patients' ratings of SDM using both validated and nonvalidated measures. This lack of strong correlation emphasizes that observer and patient perspectives are not interchangeable. When assessing the presence, absence, or extent of SDM, it is important to clearly state whose perspectives are reflected.

Producción científica sobre la COVID-19 y Medicina Familiar en DIMENSIONS / Scientific production on COVID-19 and Family Medicine in DIMENSIONS

El análisis bibliométrico permite observar tendencias dentro de la literatura científica, extraer conclusiones sobre el impacto del material publicado y, lo que es más importante, dirigir los esfuerzos de investigación y financiación de una manera más informada. Se realizó un estudio observacional y descriptivo, de carácter transversal, de tipología bibliométrica con el objetivo de caracterizar la producción científica de la COVID-19 y la Medicina Familiar en la base de datos DIMENSIONS durante el periodo de enero hasta julio del 2020. La base de datos DIMENSIONS permitió obtener información de los 10 mil 738 artículos que formaron parte de la muestra. Se utilizó VOSviewer para la obtención de matrices, la visualización y análisis, así como la colaboración entre investigadores. Se generó toda la información a través de mapas científicos. Predominaron los artículos por autores en investigaciones conjuntas a organizaciones de países como China, Inglaterra, Estados Unidos de América e Italia; todas de alto prestigio internacional y en revistas de alto impacto científico. La citabilidad de los documentos preponderó en los países, en orden decreciente, Estados Unidos de América, China, Reino Unido, Italia y otros en menor cuantía(AU)

Bibliometric analysis allows observing trends within the scientific literature, drawing conclusions about the impact of published material, and most importantly directing research and funding efforts in a more informed way. An observational and descriptive study, of a cross-sectional nature, of a bibliometric typology was carried out in order to characterize the scientific production of COVID-19 and Family Medicine in the DIMENSIONS database during the period from January to July 2020. The base of DIMENSIONS data allowed obtaining information on the 10 thousand 738 articles that were part of the sample. VOSviewer was used for matrix extraction, visualization and analysis, as well as collaboration between investigators. All the information was generated through scientific maps. Articles by authors predominated in joint research with organizations from countries such as China, England, the United States of America and Italy; all of high international prestige and in journals of high scientific impact. The citation of the documents prevailed in the countries, in decreasing order, the United States of America, China, United Kingdom, Italy and others to a lesser extent(EU)

Medicina de Familia, una especialidad amenazada / Family Medicine, a threatened specialty

No disponible

Medicina de familia, la invención colectiva / Family medicine, the collective invention

No disponible

How Should Board Certification Evolve?

Family Medicine was a child of the 1960s. Triggered by compelling social need for care outside of large hospitals, Family Medicine emphasized access to personal physicians based in the community. As a protest movement, the ABFP required ongoing recertification for all Diplomates, with both independent examination and chart audit. Fifty years later, society and health care have changed dramatically, and it is time again to consider how Board Certification must respond to those change. We propose three interlocking arguments. First, even before COVID-19, health and health care have been in a time of fundamental transformation. Second, given the role Board Certification plays in supporting improvement of healthcare, Board Certification itself must respond to these changes. Third, to move forward, ABFM and the wider Board community must address a series of wicked problems - i.e., problems which are both complex-with many root causes-and complicated- in which interventions create new problems. The wicked problems confronting board certification include: 1) combining summative and formative assessment, 2) improving quality improvement and 3) reaffirming the social contract and professionalism and its assessment.